|
Post by James Smith on Nov 15, 2008 16:05:40 GMT -5
If we all agree (and "all" includes the people responsible for making this film) that this is actually a complete re-boot, then my stance is as follows.
As far as the ship goes:
The nacelles - don't mind 'em. Almost look Endeavor-ish if you squint really hard ;D The primary hull/saucer section - okay with it. The secondary hull/engineering section - ugly, ugly, ugly. And why the hell is the saucer set that far back on the engineering section? Just makes it look completely unbalanced.
As far as what we know about the rest of the movie goes:
I'm up for it. Simon Pegg as Scotty? Going to be awesome. I'll forgive the movie a lot just for having Simon Pegg. And hell - it can't possibly be any worse than the unmitigated disaster that was "Nemesis"....*shudder*
|
|
|
Post by Atrahasis on Nov 15, 2008 19:38:33 GMT -5
Where be the "new" trailer?
|
|
|
Post by Raventree on Nov 15, 2008 23:13:48 GMT -5
to me it simply looked..awkward..though the few frontal shots in the trailer seemed to be just about right..so from certain angles, this ship looks good... it seems like the PTB at Paramount picked the WORST possible angle to show this ship at..the new trailer has me thinking positively though.. www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBQyjrRgE4clook at 49 sec..1 minute 6 seconds..and 1 minute 25 seconds... for what I mean.. but it could've been worse... much worse...
|
|
|
Post by USS Mariner on Nov 15, 2008 23:15:14 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by USS Mariner on Nov 15, 2008 23:16:57 GMT -5
but it could've been worse... much worse... After all, we could have gotten something like this.
|
|
|
Post by Atrahasis on Nov 16, 2008 5:56:39 GMT -5
Holy frak!
The new trailer rocks!
I like the concave corridor walls and the white bridge.
|
|
|
Post by Raventree on Nov 16, 2008 13:41:36 GMT -5
but it could've been worse... much worse... After all, we could have gotten something like this. Dear God in Heaven..... I'm glad it's not gonna be that bad after all....
|
|
|
Post by lurker on Nov 17, 2008 13:34:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by zerosnark on Nov 17, 2008 19:43:55 GMT -5
Hmmm. . .Somehow, having the Nacelles close together seems ok. But that secondary hull <<shudder>>
|
|
|
Post by Lord Schtupp on Nov 18, 2008 14:14:12 GMT -5
peep - Hi all ;D
Yea not too fond of it, the styling is great but they should have followed the profile of the Classic E much more closely..
|
|
|
Post by zerosnark on Nov 19, 2008 19:39:43 GMT -5
OK Atra: Where are the models?
|
|
|
Post by Atrahasis on Nov 19, 2008 21:08:14 GMT -5
I have plans to revamp using a real pay server this time, plus owning domains for my school projects so people can try them out.
|
|
|
Post by norsehound on Dec 7, 2008 20:47:14 GMT -5
Initially I was against the design too, but I'm going to give it (and the movie) a chance. After all, it's not like they're starting all over from TNG...
|
|