|
Post by USS Mariner on Jan 7, 2005 18:57:58 GMT -5
What was your take on the major problems with NEMESIS, and how would you have changed or done thingd differently? Just a diving board for ideas, but who knows what'll arise. EDIT: If you want a good NEM related laugh, go and check out Mike Wong's NEM Review. It's the first Trek related issue he got right on the money. ;D
|
|
|
Post by Atrahasis on Jan 8, 2005 1:27:44 GMT -5
LOL I love that exchange between Picard and Janeway...
It's true though, why is she an Admiral and he's not?
And the biggest problem with Nemesis was the director, plain and simple. Wasn't he the director of "XMEN" and didn't know didly from squat about Trek? They needed to make the film exciting, but not at the cost of alienating the audience. You have to create repoire with the audience, and the way to do it is show how well you know Trek.
There was also a stupid drive for the entire plot: The best plot between rivals is revenge, but Shinzon's reason was rather lame. Picard had never done anything directly to Shinzon, so killing Picard was more like a passing bonus...Great if it happens, but not that important.
The best part of the film was the first 5 minutes when the Romulan senate got killed. That was gutsy and surprising. But right after they lose that momentum and we switch to a party on the ship? Stupid! Right after that the Enterprise shold have been under attack or in an ion storm or in some kind of trouble.
|
|
|
Post by CaptainPierce on Jan 17, 2005 22:40:04 GMT -5
Now you've done it--you've given me an excuse to post my review of "Nemesis..." Trust me, Atra, the dude who made "X-Men" would have at least tried to make a good Trek movie. The director's only previous directing credits were "Executive Decision" and "U.S. Marshals;" I think you may be thinking of the the writer, John Logan, whose most famous work prior to this was "Gladiator," although he's now most famously linked to "The Aviator" (and I've seen a review or two of that film that slammed Mr. Logan pretty hard). (Oh my GOD, I've just seen on IMDB that dude wrote the 2002 version of "The Time Machine." If I'd known that going in, I seriously doubt that I would EVER have gone to see Nemesis. Sweet Jesus, did that movie suck...) As to what I'd have done different... well, tried to make it interesting, for one... Made it actually consistent with at least the preceding 20 years of TNG-era Trek, for another...
|
|
|
Post by Atrahasis on Jan 17, 2005 23:53:26 GMT -5
There should've been a big-scale battle with the Romulans, for fun's sake! I'm talking about big fleet engagement.
But other than that, the movie lacked "wonder". This is the special quality that the good Trek movies have had....they somehow get you to ponder the big questions of space, time, mind, and soul.
|
|
|
Post by CaptainPierce on Jan 18, 2005 20:33:30 GMT -5
Good point, Atra. The only thing "Nemesis" made me ponder was, "Jesus, how long is this movie gonna be?"
|
|
|
Post by Atrahasis on Jan 19, 2005 4:10:43 GMT -5
Good point, Atra. The only thing "Nemesis" made me ponder was, "Jesus, how long is this movie gonna be?" LOL All I was doing was counting the new phaser banks on the Enterprise. That truly was the most interesting thing in the movie for me.
|
|
|
Post by The Half Monte on Jan 19, 2005 8:37:20 GMT -5
LOL All I was doing was counting the new phaser banks on the Enterprise. That truly was the most interesting thing in the movie for me. So I wasn't the only one paying more attention to the ship than the plot? Well, there were a few laughs. And overall, I took the movie pretty well. Then again, to quote Kirk, "I'm not a drama critic." Also, I personally think that intellectually picking stories apart, while unavoidable, can get out of hand. For instance, I happen to fancy the Knights of the Old Republic series. If I were to scour this story for questionable aspects, one I think I would invariably arrive at is: “Why did the Council trust Bastila with the tasks of saving the galaxy and handling the former Sith Lord when it’s obvious that her own allegiances are in doubt? Come on, the woman went from a single to a dual-blade lightsaber…according to what I know of Star Wars, that’s pretty indicative of being more susceptible to the allure of the dark side…” One could walk all over the question, but why? Aside from being an integral part of the story, is it really as much a mind-fuck (pardon me) as one may think it to be? So, is Nemesis deserving of the same justification? After a few years to think on it, I have to give a vehement “you wish, Berman.” Especially when the degree of writing incompetence is at the stratospheric level this film demonstrates. Star Trek is already written off by some as being too idealistic. While I disagree, Janeway getting promoted to admiral despite torching the Prime Directive wholesale doesn’t do anything for my stance, does it? Neither does sending the flagship into hostile territory with no attempt back her up should the political unrest get to the point that someone thinks it’s a good idea to steal it, try to destroy it, etc. Sure, there are many cases of a lone ship crossing via foreign space to conduct diplomatic business. But this wasn’t a trip to Qo’noS, people…it was to Romulus, home of some of the most devious, well-documented tricksters in the known galaxy. They’re so deceptive, I wouldn’t put it past them to create a story to lure the Enterprise there so that they could scrap her for all the grief the Picard and company has caused in the past. Yet, her only backup is behind some green cloud that you can't get a clear comm signal through? Gotcha. Maybe I’m now getting too critical, but movies filled with so many careless mind-fucks (sorry) do that, don’t they?
|
|
|
Post by CaptainPierce on Jan 19, 2005 19:14:18 GMT -5
The beginnings of some good ideas are visible in Nemesis, but IMO what the script needed was a major rewrite by somebody who'd actually watched Star Trek a couple of times. Logan's claim of being a huge Trekkie is only substantiated by the number of classic Trek moments he shamelessly ripped off... And he'd probably only seen those on the clip DVD that Berman sent him...
|
|